The #1 Most Productive clinical research mentorship
Get un-lost in the publication process.
Publish peer-reviewed clinical research on your schedule with expert physician mentorship. Strengthen your AMCAS or ERAS application today.
“I once spent a hundred hours doing manual chart review, only to have the project abruptly canceled. I devoted the next thousand hours to mastering the publication process. Med-RAMP distills my exact publishing workflow and the lessons I learned along the way.”
Beau Hsia, MD — Otolaryngology (ENT) Resident Physician, Founder of Med-RAMPDownload the Exact Instructions that Produced 100s of Abstracts
Get the step-by-step protocol our students utilized to publish peer-reviewed conference abstracts using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Research shouldn’t feel like an impossible maze.
Most students pour hundreds of hours into research and still end up with an empty CV. The traditional system just isn't built for your timeline.
Ghosted by faculty
Sending dozens of cold emails to busy attendings, only to get left on read, or told they simply don't have time to take on a student.
Endless lab busywork
Spending months pipetting or doing grunt data entry without ever touching the manuscript or earning authorship.
Stuck in IRB purgatory
Waiting 9 to 12 months just for institutional approval before you can take your first step
Application deadline dread
Watching your AMCAS or ERAS deadline creep closer while programs demand research productivity.
From zero to a submission-ready abstract in 7 milestone days.
A clear path from idea to peer-reviewed submission without the guessing games or useless busywork
-
Learn the Blueprint
Scientific writing is surprisingly simple. We give you tested templates and protocols, so you know exactly where to start.
-
Do the Research
Apply your research skills to a never-before-seen topic to contribute to science.
-
Polish & Submit
Work directly with Dr. Beau Hsia, who will review your work line-by-line to maximize acceptance by conferences and journals.
Our 100% Execution Guarantee
We respect your time and financial investment. If you complete the defined writing milestones, submit your data interpretation on schedule, and follow the step-by-step protocol, yet fail to produce a submission-ready abstract draft, we will issue a full 100% tuition refund.
Scientific peer review remains independent; in compliance with ICMJE ethics, no institution can guarantee external journal acceptance. We guarantee the draft's standard under our guidance.
The proof is in the publications.
Our process has been verified hundreds of times by academic peer reviewers, resulting in 150+ peer-reviewed publications
Clear cell–type squamous cell carcinoma: An NCDB analysis.
Genomic landscape of schwannomas: An analysis of somatic mutations and demographic disparities.
Mutational Landscape of FGFR4 Across Malignancies: A Cross-Cancer Analysis of the AACR Project GENIE Database.
Genomic Characteristics of Leiomyosarcoma: An AACR Project GENIE Study.
Genomic Insights into Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Proven admission outcomes.
What candidates report after completing structured clinical research under physician oversight.
“Med-RAMP was central to my acceptances to multiple medical schools. I collaborated with pre-med and medical students to author abstracts and manuscripts. The mentorship gave me concrete, meaningful scientific experiences to speak about during admissions interviews.”
“Securing verifiable research experience as an undergraduate felt impossible until Med-RAMP. I executed projects that resulted in published papers and learned professional medical writing. Beau’s strategic guidance proved crucial during the application cycle.”
“At Med-RAMP, effort directly correlated with publishable results. Elsewhere, I felt abandoned without actionable milestones. The mentorship focuses strictly on work that meets peer-review criteria. It was pivotal in my journey to Mayo Clinic.”
“I joined as an undergraduate overwhelmed by institutional gatekeeping. Here, I developed authentic competence analyzing registries and drafting abstracts. Recommended without hesitation to any serious pre-medical scholar.”
Structured mentorship tiers.
Transparent enrollment tiers. Every paid track involves milestone reviews by Dr. Beau Hsia and is backed by our execution guarantee.
| Program | Tuition | Curriculum & Deliverables | Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abstract Template
Self-paced framework
|
$0
Complimentary delivery
|
|
Download |
|
Abstract Masterclass
Founding Cohort (10 Seats)
|
$249
Founding rate (Reg. $349). Split across up to 3 co-authors (~$83/student).
|
|
|
|
Manuscript Masterclass
Full-Length Manuscript
|
$849
Split with up to 3 classmates
|
|
|
|
1-Year Fellowship
Comprehensive Advisory
|
$2,999
Limited annual capacity
|
|
Frequently asked questions.
Specific details concerning databases, institutional ethics, co-authorship, and academic workflow.
No. Our clinical protocols emphasize study design, cohort isolation, and scientific drafting. Tabular registry datasets are pre-structured so that students can extract statistically sound cohorts using accessible spreadsheets and verified templates without learning biostatistical coding languages from scratch.
We train candidates on federally de-identified, publicly available registries such as the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and AACR Project GENIE. Under US Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46), research involving pre-existing, fully de-identified public data does not constitute human-subjects research requiring prospective institutional review committee clearance.
Yes. For both the Abstract Masterclass and Manuscript Masterclass, teams of up to three students may enroll on a single project, distribute the milestones collaboratively, and divide the cost equally (reducing Abstract Masterclass tuition to approximately $83 per student).
Mentorship mirrors an academic attending's real workflow: concise, written feedback at predefined checkpoints. You draft specific sections according to the protocol modules, and Dr. Beau reviews your submission with line-level edits, structural critique, and logical corrections to ensure submission viability.
Once your abstract is finalized and submitted to a peer-reviewed medical congress or journal, it may be listed under official entries such as "Peer-Reviewed Conference Abstracts" or "Works Submitted" in full compliance with AAMC guidelines, serving as substantive discussion points during admissions interviews.
Eliminate research gatekeeping from your application.
Join hundreds of future physicians who replaced academic delays with deliberate, repeatable scientific execution.